COMPARISON OF APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
Keywords:
arbitration process, civil process, appeal, appellate proceedings, appealing of a court decrees, appellate court.
Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of proceedings in appeal courts: civil and arbitration processes.
The mechanism of realization of the right of appeal is analyzed - similarities and differences
References
1. "Grazhdanskij processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii" ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ, "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 220, 20.11.2002.
2. "Arbitrazhnyj processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii" ot 24.07.2002 N 95-FZ, "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 137, 27.07.2002
3. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2020 N 12 "O primenenii Arbitrazhnogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii
pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnom sude apelljacionnoj instancii", "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 156, 17.07.2020.
4. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.06.2021 N 16 "O primenenii sudami norm grazhdanskogo processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva,
reglamentirujushhih proizvodstvo v sude apelljacionnoj instancii", "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 144, 02.07.2021.
5. Federal'nyj konstitucionnyj zakon ot 28.04.1995 N 1-FKZ
6. "Ob arbitrazhnyh sudah v Rossijskoj Federacii"(red. ot 16.04.2022) "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 93, 16.05.1995
7. Kuemzhieva Ja.N. Proizvodstvo v sude apelljacionnoj instancii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe Rossii: shodstva i otlichija
/ Ja.N. Kuemzhieva, E.A. Vinichenko // Novoe slovo v nauke: strategii razvitija: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Cheboksary, 22 okt. 2017 g.). V 2
t. T. 2 / red.kol.: O.N. Shirokov [i dr.] — Cheboksary: CNS «Interaktiv pljus», 2017. — S. 215–221.
2. "Arbitrazhnyj processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii" ot 24.07.2002 N 95-FZ, "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 137, 27.07.2002
3. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.06.2020 N 12 "O primenenii Arbitrazhnogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii
pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnom sude apelljacionnoj instancii", "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 156, 17.07.2020.
4. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.06.2021 N 16 "O primenenii sudami norm grazhdanskogo processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva,
reglamentirujushhih proizvodstvo v sude apelljacionnoj instancii", "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 144, 02.07.2021.
5. Federal'nyj konstitucionnyj zakon ot 28.04.1995 N 1-FKZ
6. "Ob arbitrazhnyh sudah v Rossijskoj Federacii"(red. ot 16.04.2022) "Rossijskaja gazeta", N 93, 16.05.1995
7. Kuemzhieva Ja.N. Proizvodstvo v sude apelljacionnoj instancii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe Rossii: shodstva i otlichija
/ Ja.N. Kuemzhieva, E.A. Vinichenko // Novoe slovo v nauke: strategii razvitija: materialy II Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Cheboksary, 22 okt. 2017 g.). V 2
t. T. 2 / red.kol.: O.N. Shirokov [i dr.] — Cheboksary: CNS «Interaktiv pljus», 2017. — S. 215–221.
Published
2022-09-23
How to Cite
Zhilka, E.V. 2022. “COMPARISON OF APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS”. EurasianUnionScientists, September, 06-08. https://econ-law.euroasia-science.ru/index.php/Euroasia/article/view/822.
Section
Article
CC BY-ND
A work licensed in this way allows the following:
1. The freedom to use and perform the work: The licensee must be allowed to make any use, private or public, of the work.
2. The freedom to study the work and apply the information: The licensee must be allowed to examine the work and to use the knowledge gained from the work in any way. The license may not, for example, restrict "reverse engineering."
2. The freedom to redistribute copies: Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, in the same form as the original.
