ENFORCEMENT OF COLLATERAL OBLIGATIONS (MORTGAGE):  CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO OVERCOME THEM

T. Konovalova; E. Koval

doi:10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560

T. Konovalova The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
E. Koval The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2021.2.93.2.1560

Keywords: pledge, mortgage, mortgage subject, sole dwelling, foreclosure

Abstract

This article is devoted to the problem of foreclosure on property that is the subject of a mortgage. A brief review of the historical development of the mortgage institute is carried out, the features of the mortgage subject are highlighted, various approaches to determining the legal nature of the mortgage are considered. On the basis of these theoretical provisions, the problems of law enforcement are considered. The acts of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, which contain explanations on the possibility of foreclosure on the only housing that is the subject of a mortgage, are analyzed. Examples of decisions of arbitration courts following explanations given by higher courts are given. The conclusion is made about the need for legislative consolidation of the conditions and criteria for foreclosure on the only housing in order to improve legislative regulation in the studied area.

Author Biographies

T. Konovalova , The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

Associate Professor of the Department of Customs Administration of the Faculty of Economic Security and Customs

E. Koval , The Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

2nd year student of the direction "Customs" The Faculty of Security and Customs

References

1.Altuhova N.V., Kuchapina A.A. Analiz tendencij ipotechnogo zhilishhnogo kreditovanija v Rossijskoj Federacii // Simvol nauki. 2016. № 3. S. 14-20.
2.Bevzenko R.S. Ponjatie i vozniknovenie prava zaloga// Zakon. 2016. № 3. S. 26-45.
3.Volkov A.A. Ipotechnoe kreditovanie: sushhnost', funkcii, klassifikacija //Vestnik Akademii znanij. 2020. № 3. S. 325-330.
4.Grishaev S.P. Vse o nedvizhimosti (registracija prava, kuplja-prodazha, mena, darenie, arenda, naem zhilogo pomeshhenija, ipoteka, nasledovanie): Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. – M.: Izdatel'stvo BEK. 2000. 253 s.
5.Eroshenkov S.G. Analiz istorii i jevoljucii ipoteki na primere razvityh i razvivajushhihsja stran – M.: MT-Press. 2004. S. 19-34.
6.Ipotechnoe kreditovanie zhilishhnogo stroitel'stva: Ucheb. posobie / pod. obshh. red. S.A. Baronina, V.S. Kazejkina. M.: INFRA-M, 2014 142 s.
7.Kalugin R.A. Zalog v rimskom prave // Problemy pravovogo obespechenija bezopasnosti lichnosti, obshhestva i gosudarstva. 2015. № 1. S. 267-270.
8.Kulakov V.V. Zalog nedvizhimosti kak sposob obespechenija ispolnenija objazatel'stv: Dis…kand. jurid. nauk. Ul'janovsk, 1999. S. 102.
9.Rodimenkina V.V. Osobennosti obrashhenija vzyskanija na imushhestvo, javljajushheesja predmetom ipoteki // Leningradskij juridicheskij zhurnal. 2020. № 4. S. 88-92.
10. Rossijskoe grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik: V 2 t. T. II: Objazatel'stvennoe pravo / Otv. red. E.A. Suhanov. – 2-e izd., stereotip. M.: Statut. 2011. 443 s. A15-210119/2019. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/3314fbb2-5f99-4144-ba70c6b1266d414d (data obrashhenija: 11.11.2021).

ENFORCEMENT OF COLLATERAL OBLIGATIONS (MORTGAGE): CURRENT STATE, PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO OVERCOME THEM

Abstract

Author Biographies

References

CC BY-ND